I keep asking myself, what is the angle behind the failbill?
What is the inverted syntax?
I’ve suspected this sort of thing too. And why not?
The way Davis sees it, the system has become dysfunctional. Bush has so destroyed the partyâ€™s public standing and Congress has become so infected with a win-at-all-costs mentality that there is no point in staying. â€œYou know, the Cubs fans used to put the bags over their heads,â€ he told me when we met for eggs at Mickeyâ€™s Dining Car in St. Paul the first morning of the Republican National Convention. â€œThatâ€™s what I feel when you say youâ€™re from Congress, because there are just so many things weâ€™re not doing.â€
This might be dismissed if it came from a fringe player on Capitol Hill, but for years Davis was one of the rising stars, a quintessential inside player who as part of the leadership managed to steer his party to election victories in even-numbered years while working with Democrats on legislation in odd-numbered years. He ran the House Republican campaign committee for two elections and later bypassed more senior congressmen to become chairman of the House Government Reform Committee until his party lost control of Congress. He spent a lifetime getting to this point and is now washing his hands of it, even as he foresees a fiscal reckoning after so much unbridled government spending, most recently to bail out Wall Street.
It’s not really the narrative that matters here. But the “kind” of work being done. Which doesn’t appear to be much. The votes mentioned sound like maneuverings.