Francena tells me that some of the students today addressed Macbeth’s plot. This could be interesting. We could deal with plot at several levels–the typical events of a tragedy which call for the fall of a great man, a formula which lays down the pearls of the “plot line.” Tragedy gives us a sense of what “should” happen (1.1 is already significant in this regard). Although, by doing so, it might set a tension between what should happen versus what we wish would not happen. Or we could deal with significant events as they arise as we read. For example, we meet the witches in Act 1 and Duncan getting the story of Macbeth’s military accomplishments just after in scene 2. Which of these scenes is more important in terms of plot? And why should we care? Does the news provided Duncan “propel” MacBeth into his meeting with the witches? Does Scene 2 accomplish something else?
-
About
A weblog on new media, teaching, creative ecology, and other arts.
Header: Peace -
My Work
100 Days: 100 Poems, Summer 2008Untitled Document
-
Categories
- Children
- Comics
- Contemporary Fiction
- Culture
- English literature
- Epistemology
- Fiction and Poetry
- Film
- Food and Drink
- General Comment
- General Literature
- Hypertext
- Media Space
- New Media
- Notes
- On the Desk
- Photography
- Politics
- Politics and Economics
- Reading Hypertext: A Series
- Reading: a series
- Research: A Series
- Rhetoric
- Science
- Space
- Teaching
- Writing
- WRorschach: Novel Fun
-
Comics
-
Letters
- Beatrice
- Book Forum
- Carianne’s 100 Drawings
- Chekhov's Mistress
- Daniel Green: The Reading Experience
- Dirt-Worshipper
- Epiphanies
- In the Middle
- Jason Jones
- Jeremy Jones
- Jesse Abbot
- Josh Corey
- Laminations
- Medievalists.net
- MetaxuCafe
- Poem Addiction
- Real Live Preacher
- Realmscapes
- Romantic Circles
- Spinning
- The Valve – A Literary Organ
- Tribelet of Hoodlums
- World Literature Today
- Wormtalk and Slugspeak
-
New Media
- ACM SIGWEB
- Art Games
- Buzzcut
- Carianne Mack
- Charles Deemer
- Connecticut Weblogs
- Critical Spatial Practice
- David Millard
- Diane Greco
- Digital Ethnography
- Dreaming Methods
- Electronic Literature Organization
- Five Fingers
- Gamer Dad
- GDC
- Grand Text Auto
- Hypercompendia
- HypertextNow
- if:book
- IGDA
- Information Aesthetics
- Interactive Architecture Dot Org
- J. Nathan Matias
- Jerz’s Literacy Weblog
- Just Adventure
- Literatronic
- Mark Bernstein
- MATERIAL ECOLOGY
- Narratopedia
- Neha’s Q Blog
- Persuasive Games
- Processing
- Project for Public Spaces
- Rhizome
- Roger Travis
- Serious Games Initiative
- Space and Culture
- Steve Klema
- Tale of Tales
- Ted Nelson
- TEKKAlogue
- The Hyperliterature Exchange
- Tim Mack
- Tunxis New Media
- Wax-work
- Writer Response Theory
-
Politics and Economics
-
Science
-
Teaching, Learning, Space, and Technology
-
The Past
-
Meta




One Comment
Act I, scene 1 accomplishes setting the tone of the plot. It provides us with the first motif (the supernatural) we see throughout, but also a sense of confusion. Macbeth will later grapple with severe moral confusion. The weird sisters speak in contradictions: “Fair is foul, and foul is fair” or, in others words, these 3 weirdos speak truths but conceal them with two meanings which causes disorder and chaos. It could be said that a theme of chaos immediately begins with this short but affective scene. Scene 2 provides bloody foreshadowing of the great amounts of blood that Macbeth will have on his hands later in the play. This scene may “propel” our idea of the bloodshed Macbeth is capable of, but I believe the real “propelling” comes out of the next coupe of scenes when Macbeth’s ambition is propelled to run amuck after hearing the witches prophecies then having one of them confirmed in the very next scene.