Interesting, but predictable results from an Economist poll of economists on the candidates. Here’s a bite:
A candidateâ€™s economic expertise may matter rather less if he surrounds himself with clever advisers. Unfortunately for Mr McCain, 81% of all respondents reckon Mr Obama is more likely to do that; among unaffiliated respondents, 71% say so. That is despite praise across party lines for the excellent Doug Holtz-Eakin, Mr McCainâ€™s most prominent economic adviser and a former head of the Congressional Budget Office. â€œAlthough I have tended to vote Republican,â€ one reply says, â€œthe Democrats have a deep pool of talented, moderate economists.â€
There is an apparent contradiction between most economistsâ€™ support for free trade, low taxes and less intervention in the market and the low marks many give to Mr McCain, who is generally more supportive of those things than Mr Obama. It probably reflects a perception that the Republican Party under George Bush has subverted many of those ideals for ideology and political gain. Indeed, the majority of respondents rate Mr Bushâ€™s economic record as very bad, and Republican respondents are only slightly less critical.
Thanks to Matthew Nisbet for the link.