Dave Winer makes a good point in a post on the identity of government
The cure, imho, is to create new business entities that serve the users first. Sure the shareholders make money, when you take a risk and produce a product or service that people want, thatâ€™s great and there must be rewards or people wonâ€™t risk. Iâ€™m a capitalist. But the things these companies are doing now is not capitalism. They know we donâ€™t have time to understand all the ways they can screw each of us individually. If we did, there would be no time for living. So we should hire people to study what theyâ€™re doing and route around it. Either make it illegal, or start a co-op to offer the same service or product without the gotchas.
Thatâ€™s the reasoning behind the health insurance â€œpublic option,â€ which is a damned good idea. Weâ€™ve tried it the way the insurance industry wants to do it, and the result is a lot of needless death, sickness, and wasted money. So, they can keep doing what theyâ€™re doing, but weâ€™re going to pool our resources and self-insure. We could either form a new entity to do it, or we could use the one we already went to the trouble to create.
I’ve been complaining in other posts about how entities do business in the local village, what services are offered and how this is done or not done to service of a core need. What is capitalism? Is it making a living and providing service (insurance companies don’t wield scalpels) or is the business plan about money first? The role of government, in a definitional sense, also comes back to every congressperson’s role, as well.