Here’s the same old circle
Some Web evangelists say children should be evaluated for their proficiency on the Internet just as they are tested on their print reading comprehension. Starting next year, some countries will participate in new international assessments of digital literacy, but the United States, for now, will not.
Clearly, reading in print and on the Internet are different. On paper, text has a predetermined beginning, middle and end, where readers focus for a sustained period on one authorâ€™s vision. On the Internet, readers skate through cyberspace at will and, in effect, compose their own beginnings, middles and ends.
Young people â€œarenâ€™t as troubled as some of us older folks are by reading that doesnâ€™t go in a line,â€ said Rand J. Spiro, a professor of educational psychology at Michigan State University who is studying reading practices on the Internet. â€œThatâ€™s a good thing because the world doesnâ€™t go in a line, and the world isnâ€™t organized into separate compartments or chapters.â€
Some traditionalists warn that digital reading is the intellectual equivalent of empty calories. Often, they argue, writers on the Internet employ a cryptic argot that vexes teachers and parents. Zigzagging through a cornucopia of words, pictures, video and sounds, they say, distracts more than strengthens readers. And many youths spend most of their time on the Internet playing games or sending instant messages, activities that involve minimal reading at best.
Much of this is the equivalent of a ripped, jumbled map, where “you are here” is positioned at random.
So much has been written on hypertext. But are the “experts” reading?